Everything below is stated so the numbers can be argued with. If a step looks
wrong to you, the per-launch rows are on /v1/study/launches — recompute it.
When several wallets from a "smart money" set buy the same new pump.fun token within seconds, does that token graduate more often than it otherwise would?
A wallet enters it by trading history only — no manual picks, no follower counts: at least 15 distinct tokens traded, at least 8 closed round-trips, and a median realised return above +3%. That is a deliberately low bar, which matters: it means the set is large, and a large set makes accidental co-occurrence more likely. Hence the control.
The comparison is not "smart wallets vs nothing". It is against random active wallets that are not in the set, sampled to match the tracked set's share of the early-buyer stream. So both columns face the same token, the same moment, and the same crowd size — only membership differs.
early_buyers — distinct buyers in the first 60 seconds.smart_peak30 — the most tracked wallets seen inside any 30-second window.placebo_peak30 — the same measure on the control set.curl https://api.smugcalls.com/v1/study/launches?limit=25 returns the rows the
aggregates are built from: buyers, tracked count, placebo count, outcome. Group them however
you like. If your numbers disagree with ours, we would like to know.